Welcome to the Rise of Agon Community

Create an account today to engage in discussions and community events on the Rise of Agon forums.

So, do you guys think it's ok for 1 clan to be able to drop 20 sieges within 24 hours?

Discussion in 'Feedback' started by Myater, May 6, 2018.

  1. Andrew

    Andrew Eodrin
    Staff Member BPG Representative

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2015
    Messages:
    2,046
    Likes Received:
    4,627
    That's fine they can complain if they feel they have a problem to complain about just like everyone can. We're not undoing any current sieges as that is the current ruleset and not making any sky is falling decisions. The situation has sparked internal discussions on siege mechanics that are going to be changed anyways during the tcs implementation. We may make no changes or some kind of tweak to the current system, we are simply discussing at this time.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
    Fengor and Sero like this.
  2. Sero

    Sero Menhir Sentinal
    Loyal Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Messages:
    7,518
    Likes Received:
    9,603
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]


    Thoughts?
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  3. Hook

    Hook Chosen of Khamset
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2016
    Messages:
    712
    Likes Received:
    623
    Let it riiiiipppppppppp
     
  4. Void

    Void Varangian Warthane
    Loyal Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2016
    Messages:
    840
    Likes Received:
    595
    So by this logic you say you won’t do anything because it’s in the game and it’s currently part of the ruelset. Ok fine . So spamming light and beacon are in the game and are considered part of the current rule set . So how can you say we can’t do one but you won’t say they can’t do another. Is bind camping aloud or is that considered greffing?
     
  5. Kubalay

    Kubalay Goblin Warrior
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 17, 2016
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    13
    This is a hardcore pvp, noncarebear game. If you can't handle the heat, go back to the blue town and count your pixels.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  6. Johhny Mad Dog

    Johhny Mad Dog Celestial

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2015
    Messages:
    646
    Likes Received:
    564
    I wish I could drop sieges. Our 3 man clan needs a castle
     
  7. Andrew

    Andrew Eodrin
    Staff Member BPG Representative

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2015
    Messages:
    2,046
    Likes Received:
    4,627
    The wager costs are going to be increased both on cities and hamlets as they currently are quite low. We will be looking at a few changes to the siege system during tcs implementation as well. For now we'll be updating the wager costs to be more in line with current gold faucets. Sieges should not be so cheap that they can be thrown about so willy nilly. Multi sieging is a viable strategy in the sandbox and we don't want to limit freedom of choice.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
    The Red King, Myater and Isaac Clarke like this.
  8. Isaac Clarke

    Isaac Clarke Varangian Warthane
    Hero

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    803
    Likes Received:
    1,181
    Thoughts?
     
    The Red King likes this.
  9. Sero

    Sero Menhir Sentinal
    Loyal Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Messages:
    7,518
    Likes Received:
    9,603
    [​IMG]

    Thoughts?
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  10. Isaac Clarke

    Isaac Clarke Varangian Warthane
    Hero

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    803
    Likes Received:
    1,181
    Repost
     
  11. Hombre 6

    Hombre 6 Goblin Warlord
    Hero

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2016
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    70
    Guess we will see if the old Reign machine can keep up
     
    Andrew likes this.
  12. Not_Primetime

    Not_Primetime Infernal
    Wealthy Legend

    Joined:
    May 21, 2016
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    410
    System working as designed. I think when it all over you're only hold the the cities that you were able to defend. The better question is how does a Clan/Alliance have 20 holdings, that is a better question for BPG answer. The upkeep on 20 holdings should be expensive as hell.

    LOL Oh no pixel will be lost!
     
    Hook and Sero like this.
  13. Sero

    Sero Menhir Sentinal
    Loyal Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Messages:
    7,518
    Likes Received:
    9,603
    Nothing else needs to be said.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  14. Hook

    Hook Chosen of Khamset
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2016
    Messages:
    712
    Likes Received:
    623
    They won't do anything about that cuz no one has cried hard enough about it yet and I'm sure if they did do something about it, power rangers would threaten to quit
     
    Sero likes this.
  15. Not_Primetime

    Not_Primetime Infernal
    Wealthy Legend

    Joined:
    May 21, 2016
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    410
    The better question is how does a Clan/Alliance have 20 holdings? The upkeep on 20 holdings should be expensive as hell. Funny your siding with a Clan/Alliance that shouldn't be able to have that many holdings. This is working a designed. In the end they will have the holdings that they were able to defend. Yet you feel the need to protect them with code changes, really?
     
  16. kilrain

    kilrain Shadow Knight
    Staff Member Developer Team Lead

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2015
    Messages:
    3,797
    Likes Received:
    6,408
    We're not siding with anyone. We are not adding incremental costs, we are not removing the ability to siege more than one place at a time, but the costs of sieging a hamlet are very low considering the costs of a city and the fact that we've improved the value of hamlets with the introduction of crafting stations it only makes sense that it should be increased.

    This is the very definition of sandbox and if players want a sandbox then they need to take the good with the bad. If we remove the ability for an alliance with several holdings to be sieged in such a fashion then we'll have to look at the ability for an alliance to own that many holdings to begin with.

    The first thing that came to my mind when this was brought to my attention was, "let them spend all that money and take back the ones you might lose when they're broke".
     
    The Red King and Fengor like this.
  17. Isaac Clarke

    Isaac Clarke Varangian Warthane
    Hero

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    803
    Likes Received:
    1,181
    First thing that came to my mind was how do I get to all our holdings from sang
     
    Grimtide likes this.
  18. Andrew

    Andrew Eodrin
    Staff Member BPG Representative

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2015
    Messages:
    2,046
    Likes Received:
    4,627
    There is no upkeep currently but there will be upkeeps and more benefits added with TCS.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
    Fengor likes this.
  19. Not_Primetime

    Not_Primetime Infernal
    Wealthy Legend

    Joined:
    May 21, 2016
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    410
    I guessing you didn't read what your boss said? Perception is 9/10th of the law.
     
  20. Johhny Mad Dog

    Johhny Mad Dog Celestial

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2015
    Messages:
    646
    Likes Received:
    564
    The more holdings you have the more you have to defend. It's working as intended but it's based on a bigger playerbase where clans don't have 20-25 holdings. So yeah, might have to make a little change.

    While we are at it. Having 10 actives for a Hamlet siege or 20 for a holding should be changed to. It's also based on a bigger playerbase which we sadly don't have.