Greetings, I am Raap, present leader of The Chaldean Dynasty (not to be confused with The Chad Dynasty, our great-great rival). We are a relatively new clan with a lot of new/returning players, and we are purely EU based. Our sole ally is "Clan" which is just a small group of 4 players. We have no desire to ally more clans and have already rejected several requests for alliances so far. Tonight at 3 AM EU time, Angfrost, our main city, was sieged by Intensity and their allies Battle Saints. This siege is the latest in several back-and-forth sieges between our clan and their alliance. A conflict which was initiated by Intensity and Battle Saints. During our first day as a clan on Agon, we took over The Chaldean Dynasty and along with it came the city of Elharrat. On that very same day, Battle Saints, unprovoked, initiated 6 AM asset destruction on our city, obliterating it completely. In response, we went to look for them a few hours later (as we woke up) at their nearby holdings, and broke a few exits/chambers in the process but could not find them. The next morning we woke up to see the city leveled to the ground a second time, this time they brought their full alliance at 6 AM and disabled everything. I then proceeded to ask the Intensity leader what their issue was, and if he could forward my message to his allies. Here is this conversation: The next day, they sieged Elharrat, our only city. Fast forward to right before the Angfrost siege. I proposed to both the Battle Saints leaders and the Intensity leader a stop to a conflict where we cannot attend in good numbers due to the timezone missmatch. However my proposal was rejected: Knowing we're a poor clan since most of us only started playing very recently, they pull out the economy card along with some Jihad Muslim insults, and proceed with several nights of 6 AM asset destruction, demolishing all our holdings. In an effort to retaliate, we sieged Sweetwater. Unfortunately, they managed to convince several members of Defiance that "Poor Battle Saints is a new player clan and our city got sieged, please help!!", and during the main fight, we got zerged extremely hard by two forces pushing in from two sides (in an admittedly bad location). This made them defend Sweetwater. And then tonight at 3 AM EU time, we fought for our main city independently with just The Chaldean Dynasty and Clan, but unfortunately due to the time of the siege we only managed to get about 15 people online. We had one fight and it wasn't working well for us, so we retreated. We would have lost our main city there, but because Defiance helped them directly at Sweetwater, I made the decision to call a few people in for help from various clans while compensating them for this. The end result was a second fight where we had equal numbers to the attackers, and overall it was an enjoyable fight. In short, it was not our choice for this conflict to reach this stage. As evidence shows we were the target of an alliance looking for "easy prey", and now that they are upset that they lost the Angfrost siege, they are spreading a lot of lies about some big alliance being against them. The truth is they lost a fair fight at a battle they picked to be completely in their favour. I hope this clears up any misinformation being spread around at the moment. Regards, Raap "Kermit" Naap.